Oct

Singapore Hotel Market Investment Timing Analysis (Q4 2025)

Last Updated

October 22, 2025

Market Fundamentals: Rebound in Tourism and RevPAR

‍

Singapore’s tourism and hotel fundamentals have staged a robust recovery from the pandemic trough. International visitor arrivals surged +21% in 2024 to 16.5 million[5], reaching about 86% of the 2019 peak and on track for 17–18.5 million in 2025[6]. Crucially, tourism receipts are hitting new highs (forecast to top 2019’s record S$27.7B) on the back of longer stays and higher spending[7]. This rebound has translated into hotel performance exceeding pre-pandemic benchmarks. By 2023, market-wide occupancy reached 80.5% and RevPAR (revenue per available room) hit S$219, surpassing 2019 levels[8]. In 2024, RevPAR rose further to S$226 with occupancy at 81.8%[8]. Notably, room rates (ADR) have leapt to record levels (S$273 in 2023) even with slightly lower occupancy than 2019, as hotels leveraged strong pricing power during big events (e.g. Formula 1, marquee concerts) to offset any remaining demand gaps[9].

Figure 1: Singapore hotel RevPAR collapsed ~60% in 2020 amid COVID (RevPAR S$89) and remained low in 2021, but has fully recovered by 2023–2024. By 2024, RevPAR (~S$226) surpassed pre-pandemic levels, underpinned by rate growth and an 80%+ occupancy run-rate[8]. This V-shaped recovery in revenue fundamentals provides a strong income base for new investments.

‍

Crucially for the investment outlook, supply growth is extremely constrained. Singapore’s total hotel room inventory grew <2% over the past five years[10]. High construction costs, labor shortages, and a focus on smaller projects over big hotels have limited new openings[10]. In fact, it is currently cheaper to buy than to build in Singapore, as replacement cost far exceeds in-place asset values in many cases[11]. This supply-demand imbalance has kept occupancy and ADR high. For investors, tight supply means existing assets should retain pricing power, and any new development faces high barriers (but potentially outsized payoff if achieved). The tourism pipeline (e.g. new attractions, expanded air capacity) further supports demand growth. Singapore Tourism Board projects visitor volumes to continue rising in 2025, aided by restored China travel (visa-free entry reinstated) and a packed events calendar[12]. Altogether, market fundamentals are on firm footing – high occupancy, record ADR, limited new competition – forming a favorable backdrop for acquisitions.

‍

Bay Street Quantamental Metrics: Singapore Deal Profile

‍

Under Bay Street’s quantamental framework, Singapore hotel investments score strongly on risk-adjusted metrics:

‍

Adjusted Hospitality Alpha (AHA): Deals in Singapore show positive AHA, meaning after benchmarking against sector returns (e.g. Bay Street Hospitality Index) and adjusting for illiquidity, they still deliver excess return[13]. Given today’s pricing, unlevered IRRs on prime assets might be moderate (single digits); however, Singapore’s sector benchmark is also lower-risk and lower-return, so even a few percentage points of alpha clears the bar. For example, requiring AHA ≥ 2.0% as a hurdle is feasible in Singapore[14] – investors can achieve a couple percent above the hospitality baseline by active asset management (e.g. repositioning an underperforming hotel to boost NOI). The key is that Singapore’s stable cash flows make those incremental gains “real” – not illusionary levered returns. AHA strips out the illiquidity illusion[13], and in Singapore’s case the illiquidity discount is minimal because of strong buyer appetite and transparency (the market saw S$1.75B in hotel transactions in 2024)[15].
Bay Adjusted Sharpe (BAS): Singapore scores well on BAS, indicating efficient return per unit volatility[2]. The volatility of hotel cash flows and values in Singapore is relatively low – tourism demand is broad-based and the economy/policy environment is stable. Even during COVID, Singapore hotels pivoted to alternative demand (e.g. government quarantine contracts) to soften the blow. Now, with RevPAR back to steady growth, projection uncertainty is low. A Singapore deal delivering, say, a 10% IRR with low variance will have a higher Sharpe-like ratio than a 15% IRR deal in an emerging market that carries big swings. High AHA is only valuable if delivered efficiently[16], and Singapore delivers consistency. In quantitative terms, Bay Street might require BAS ≥ 0.25 for deals[17] – Singapore deals comfortably exceed this, as cash flow volatility is low relative to returns (e.g. standard deviation of annual RevPAR growth is far lower in Singapore than in resort markets). The strong BAS underscores that Singapore’s returns are resilient, supporting a higher Bay Score.
Liquidity Stress Delta (LSD): Singapore faces minimal liquidity and exit friction, so LSD adjustments are small (low delta). LSD quantifies the return drag from illiquidity, FX, and capital lock-up risks[18]. For Singapore, FX risk is modest – the Singapore dollar is one of Asia’s most stable currencies, typically fluctuating in a narrow band (SGD projected at 1.34–1.36 per USD in coming years[19]). Any FX volatility can be hedged at relatively low cost given high liquidity in SGD forwards. There are no capital controls or repatriation hurdles (Singapore allows free remittance of capital and profits) – contrast this with emerging markets where investors may face delays or special approvals to take money out[20]. Unexpected capex needs are also lower in Singapore; assets are generally well-maintained and major refurbishments can be forecasted. Finally, the exit market is deep – Singapore has an active pool of global institutional buyers for hospitality, reducing the risk of a long hold due to no buyers. In Bay Street’s scoring, an LSD under ~3.5 is considered low-risk[21], and Singapore deals typically fall well below that threshold. (By comparison, a deal in Indonesia or Vietnam might suffer a significant LSD penalty, reflecting potential delays in exit or currency conversion[22].) In sum, traditional IRRs from Singapore projects don’t need heavy haircuts for liquidity/FX – what you underwrite is more likely what you get, boosting the risk-adjusted appeal.
Bay Macro Risk Index (BMRI): Singapore has one of Asia’s lowest BMRI scores, denoting a stable macro environment. BMRI is a composite of sovereign credit, currency volatility, tourism trends, political risk, and repatriation climate[23][24]. It ranges from 0 (low risk) to 100 (high risk)[3]. Singapore lies in the “0–30 Stable” band[3] – akin to developed markets like the US – which implies essentially no IRR discount is applied for macro risk[25]. By contrast, many regional markets have far higher BMRIs: for example, Vietnam scored ~64.8 (High Risk) in a Bay Street analysis, warranting a ~200 bps IRR discount in underwriting[26][25]. Indonesia similarly would fall in the 60+ high-risk zone (one case study showed BMRI 6.3 on a 7.5-scale, equivalent to very high risk) with resulting exit provisions and return haircuts[22]. Even South Korea, a relatively advanced market, has a moderately higher BMRI (likely in the 30s), reflecting greater FX volatility and geopolitical risks than Singapore. The upshot: Singapore’s macro stability provides a clear advantage – investors do not need to pad the discount rate for country risk as they would in Jakarta, Ho Chi Minh City, or even Seoul. This boosts Singapore’s Bay Score, since BMRI feeds directly as a negative adjustment in the scoring model[27].

‍

Figure 2: Bay Macro Risk Index (BMRI) comparison for select Asian markets. Lower scores = more stable macro. Singapore’s BMRI sits in the low-20s, within the “Stable” band (0–30)[3]. South Korea is slightly higher (~30–35, edging into “Monitored” risk). Indonesia and Vietnam register much higher BMRI readings (60+), falling in the High Risk tier[26]. High-BMRI markets require significant risk-premiums – e.g. Vietnam’s ~64.8 score implies a 200 bps IRR haircut[25] – whereas Singapore’s low BMRI demands no such discount.

‍

Bay Score: Aggregating the above factors (along with qualitative overlays like ESG and sponsor quality), Singapore hotel deals achieve a Bay Score™ in the decision-ready range. Bay Score is a proprietary 0–100 composite of AHA, BAS, LSD, BMRI, and other deal factors[28]. Deals scoring ≥70 are typically considered investment-grade for Bay Street’s IC[1]. Given Singapore’s strong AHA (above +0%), high BAS, negligible LSD, and low BMRI, a well-structured deal can score in the mid-70s or higher, all else equal. For instance, internal guidelines show that to unlock later funding phases, Bay Street expects Bay Score ≥75 and maintaining ≥60 even under stress[29][30] – Singapore deals have the resilience to meet these marks. In short, the Bay Score output corroborates that Singapore offers an attractive balance of return and risk right now. High scores here contrast with the same deal’s score if it were in a riskier country – that could be 10–15 points lower due to macro and liquidity penalties. This scoring advantage translates to a go-ahead signal on Singapore acquisitions.

‍

Macro Risk: Singapore vs. Regional Peers (BMRI Context)

‍

From a top-down perspective, Singapore’s macro risk profile is best-in-class in Asia, which is pivotal when comparing opportunities across countries. The Bay Macro Risk Index differences are stark and inform portfolio allocation:

‍

Singapore (BMRI ≈ 25) – Lowest risk: Essentially on par with developed Western markets on key metrics. Sovereign spreads are minimal (AAA-rated debt), the SGD’s volatility is low (managed float under MAS policy), inbound tourism growth is steady and predictable, and governance/policy risk is very low (transparent legal system). There are no capital repatriation restrictions[31] – an investor from abroad faces zero impediment converting proceeds from SGD to USD, for example. This translates to no additional risk premium required; a projected IRR isn’t cut down by macro adjustments[25]. Singapore provides a safe harbor for capital in the region.
South Korea (BMRI ~30–35) – Moderate risk: South Korea sits slightly above the stable threshold. It enjoys strong credit ratings and infrastructure, but the Won is more volatile (subject to capital flows and occasional geopolitical jitters) and the political risk, while moderate, includes North Korea tensions and regulatory shifts. Still, BMRI would classify Korea at the upper end of “Monitored” risk[3] – likely implying a modest IRR discount (e.g. ~50–100 bps) and some hedging costs. Indeed, Seoul’s hotel market is thriving on fundamentals (7.7M international arrivals in H1 2025)[32], but from a macro lens, it doesn’t quite match Singapore’s predictability.
Vietnam (BMRI ~65) – High risk: Vietnam’s rapid growth comes with high volatility. A Bay Street example put BMRI at 64.8[26], driven by a higher sovereign spread and a very volatile currency (the dong’s 90-day vol was ~5.6% vs ~1.5% for Portugal in the example)[33]. Tourism growth can be high but from a low base (e.g. +11% vs trend, indicating potential over-reliance on a few sources)[34]. There are also some capital controls – repatriation is “somewhat restricted” in Vietnam[35]. Deals in Vietnam would face a ~200 bps IRR haircut in Bay Street’s model to account for these macro risks[25], plus likely a required illiquidity premium add-on to AHA[36]. In practice, that means a hotel needing a 18% unadjusted IRR might only be viewed as 16% after risk, eroding much of the appeal unless base returns are very high. Singapore, by avoiding these haircuts, can “punch above its weight” on a risk-adjusted return basis.
Indonesia (BMRI 60+) – High risk: While not explicitly quantified in the latest index release, Indonesia falls in the same high-risk bucket (“select ASEAN”)[37]. Indonesia’s rupiah is known for volatility and depreciation bouts (FX vol index >5% in one case)[38], sovereign yields are higher (~3.5% spread)[39], and there have historically been FX control measures (e.g. onerous repatriation process and withholding taxes). Bay Street’s prior analysis (on an older scale) rated an Indonesia deal BMRI 6.3/7.5 – firmly high risk – which triggered exit control provisions and an LSD hit[22]. Practically, that means extra safeguards and structuring (e.g. local JV with exit triggers, mandatory FX hedging) need to be layered in for an Indonesian hotel investment[40]. These protections add cost or limit flexibility, further lowering the effective return. So while headline yields in Indonesia might be higher (e.g. select Jakarta hotels could offer >10% cap rates), the Bay Street framework would heavily discount those. Singapore’s lower nominal yields, when adjusted for risk, end up stacking up very competitively against higher-yield, high-BMRI markets.

‍

In summary, Singapore offers a uniquely favorable macro backdrop in Asia’s hospitality space – an investor is compensated for risk much more efficiently there. This is reflected in Bay Street’s scoring: the same hotel cashflow under Singapore conditions yields a far higher Bay Score than if it were in a market like Vietnam or Indonesia. Thus, for a fund considering deployments across Asia, overweighting Singapore (and similar low-BMRI markets) can improve the portfolio’s Bay Adjusted Sharpe and reduce tail risks. It’s a classic case of “slow and steady wins the race” – Singapore might not have the very highest IRRs, but on a risk-adjusted basis it can deliver the best Sharpe ratio, justifying a “Buy Singapore” call over riskier bets.

‍

FX and Repatriation Risk Considerations

‍

Currency and repatriation factors bolster Singapore’s appeal for cross-border investors. All returns in Singapore are earned in Singapore Dollars (SGD), a currency known for its stability and strength. The Monetary Authority of Singapore manages the SGD against a basket, resulting in low volatility – forecasts see only gentle moves (SGD/USD ~1.35 ±0.01 in the next 5 years)[19]. This means FX risk is limited; unhedged investors face little threat of a major currency blowout. In contrast, many Asian peers have seen significant depreciation (e.g. the Indonesian Rupiah, Vietnamese Dong, even currencies like the Malaysian Ringgit have slid). Moreover, SGD often strengthens in global downturns (a safe-haven effect), which could boost foreign investors’ returns in bad times – a nice hedge.

‍

Importantly, Singapore imposes no capital controls or profit repatriation restrictions. An investor can freely remit sale proceeds or dividends out of Singapore. There are robust legal protections for foreign investors and tax treaties in place. Compare this to emerging markets where capital repatriation can be a serious bottleneck – e.g., quotas on converting local currency to USD, or requirements to seasoning periods before sending money abroad. Bay Street’s BMRI and LSD explicitly account for these issues[41][42], and Singapore essentially scores the best possible on that front (“Clean” repatriation)[31]. By contrast, Vietnam or Indonesia score worse (“somewhat restricted”)[35], requiring structuring workarounds and adding to LSD (as seen with the FX protections demanded in the India deal term sheet and other emerging-market deals)[43][44]. The Liquidity Stress Delta for a Singapore deal might only shave a few basis points off the return for a bit of FX hedge cost, whereas in a frontier market it could knock a few percentage points off due to conversion delays or forced local reinvestment periods.

‍

To illustrate, if a Singapore hotel deal underwrites to 12% IRR in SGD, you can be reasonably confident in realizing ~12% in USD terms, give or take minor forex fluctuations. In an Indonesian deal underwritten at 16%, if the Rupiah depreciates 3% p.a. and you have repatriation taxes, your realized USD IRR could easily fall to <10% – a vastly different outcome. Singapore spares investors such outcomes, which is a huge plus for timing: you can enter now without worrying that macro factors outside the hotel’s operations will undercut your returns. Additionally, Singapore’s legal system and treaty network provide certainty on exit – you can enforce contracts and get paid in foreign currency promptly, reducing the risk of being “stuck” in an investment (a risk that is very real in some developing markets during crises).

‍

For a foreign LP, we also note that FX hedging for SGD is inexpensive given the low interest differential and volatility. Forward points on SGD are moderate and there’s high liquidity in currency markets. So one could hedge the principal if desired and still retain most of the return – an option that might be cost-prohibitive in weaker currencies. All considered, Singapore offers one of the least frictional investment environments in Asia. This translates into higher effective returns and lower risk, reinforcing the case to invest in Singapore now when fundamentals are strong, rather than chase higher nominal yields in places where currency and repatriation could betray your returns.

‍

Greenfield vs. Brownfield: Timing Signals and Strategy

‍

What’s the better approach in the current cycle – acquiring existing hotels (brownfield) or developing new ones (greenfield)? We evaluate both in Singapore’s context:

‍

Brownfield Acquisitions (Existing Assets): The case for brownfield is strong in Singapore’s market today. With RevPAR at record highs and occupancy in the 80s%[8], an operating hotel in Singapore is throwing off solid cash flow from day one. By buying an existing hotel, an investor can immediately capture the ongoing tourism upswing – e.g. benefitting from the influx of events like the upcoming global conferences, concerts, etc. There is also less execution risk: the asset has a performance track record and operating infrastructure in place. In a market as tight as Singapore, securing an existing property means one less competitor (since supply is so constrained). Indeed, 2024 saw a flurry of notable acquisitions: Hotel Telegraph (134-room boutique) sold for S$180M (~S$1.34M/key)[45], Citadines Raffles Place (299 units) for S$290M (~S$970k/key), etc., indicating buyers are confident paying top dollar for Singapore assets. Valuations are lofty, with cap rates in the 4–5% range[4] (among the lowest yields in Asia). This means investors are effectively betting on continued NOI growth and long-term asset appreciation. Bay Street’s framework would note that such low going-in yields compress AHA (since excess return above sector benchmark is harder to achieve if you pay a high price). However, if one can identify value-add angles – e.g. renovate an older hotel, rebrand a mid-scale property to upscale (capturing higher ADR), or repurpose underused spaces (adding F&B or co-working revenue) – then the adjusted alpha can be boosted despite a low initial yield. Singapore has seen successful repositioning, such as CapitaLand converting the ageing Hotel G into a hip co-living “lyf” property[46] to lift rates. These strategies can improve an asset’s Bay Score by lifting its AHA and BAS (more incremental return, same risk). The timing for brownfield looks favorable: many owners held through the pandemic and have now recovered operations, so some may consider selling at today’s peak pricing. Indeed, transaction volume rebounded in 2024 (10 hotel deals vs only 3 in 2023)[47]. A potential risk to watch is interest rates – if global rates remain high or rise, cap rates could face upward pressure (reducing asset values). But the latest outlook sees Singapore’s lending rates falling from 5.3% in 2024 to ~4.8% in 2025[48], which should support current valuations. Thus, for near-term deployment, brownfield acquisitions are a timely play: one can lock in an asset with proven income, finance it at improving rates, and enjoy immediate cash yields plus upside from active asset management.
Greenfield Development (New Projects): Greenfield hotel development in Singapore is inherently challenging but potentially rewarding if timed right. The barriers to entry are high – as noted, room supply grew under 2% in five years[10]. This was due to a confluence of factors: sky-high land prices, expensive construction (materials and labor inflation), and cautious planning approvals. The government releases hotel development sites sparingly, often with stringent conditions. As a result, any new hotel that can be built stands to face little direct competition. In the current environment, however, development costs remain elevated – both construction and financing. Building a hotel in Singapore today can easily cost upwards of S$800k–1M per key for upscale/luxury (land + build), which, as research indicates, is often higher than buying an equivalent existing key[11]. This cost disadvantage has been a deterrent. Nonetheless, if an investor has unique access – for instance, a JV with a local developer on a greenfield site, or the ability to repurpose a non-hotel building into a hotel – greenfield could lock in future supply in a supply-starved market. Timing-wise, starting a project now (late 2025) means opening around 2027–2028. By then, tourism could very well exceed pre-COVID levels significantly, and Singapore’s new attractions (e.g. Mandai eco-tourism hub, Sentosa redevelopment) will be in full swing, potentially requiring more rooms. Additionally, interest rates are likely to be lower during the bulk of construction and at stabilization, reducing financing cost. One must weigh the risks: development comes with no cash flow for several years (negative carry), execution and approval risk, and the possibility that the cycle turns (if a global recession hits before opening, you’d come online into a weak market). The Bay Street framework would penalize greenfield projects via a higher LSD (for the capital lock-up period) and perhaps a lower forecast confidence score (since projections 5 years out are uncertain). However, it might also assign a higher alpha if the pro forma IRR is high. In today’s context, greenfield signals are mixed. The clear signal is that very few are building – which is why supply is so tight. This suggests opportunity: those who do build, if they manage costs, could enjoy outsized occupancy/ADR on opening due to lack of new competition. On the other hand, the market is so tight because it’s genuinely hard to build economically. Our recommendation is to prioritize brownfield unless you have a compelling angle on greenfield (e.g. a niche product or a strategic partnership that lowers cost). If pursuing greenfield, ensure a conservative timeline and budget, and perhaps target segments where new supply is specifically needed (for example, a mid-scale hotel near the upcoming Terminal 5, which breaks ground soon[49], to capture future airport-linked demand). Greenfield or brownfield, one positive timing aspect is that today’s high RevPAR environment helps underwriting – it’s easier to justify development when you see what rates can be achieved in this tight market, and easier to underwrite acquisitions with confidence in cash flows.

‍

Bottom line: The timing signals tilt toward brownfield acquisitions for immediate exposure, but greenfield projects could be selectively attractive as a play on the sustained undersupply. In both cases, Singapore’s stable outlook reduces downside – an acquired hotel is unlikely to see a demand collapse, and a new hotel is likely to ramp up in a healthy market. The Bay Street metrics would reward brownfield deals for their nearer-term cash flows (boosting Sharpe/BAS) and penalize greenfields for illiquidity duration (hurting LSD), but if one believes in Singapore’s long run, a well-timed greenfield started now might become a star performer in, say, 5 years.

‍

Valuation & Public Market Benchmarking

‍

No timing analysis is complete without checking how private market pricing stacks up against public market signals. In Singapore, several hospitality REITs and hotel owners are publicly listed, providing useful comps for valuation. Currently, listed hotel trusts trade at dividend yields around 5–6% and often at a discount to book value[50][51]. For instance, CDL Hospitality Trusts – which owns hotels in Singapore and abroad – is yielding ~5.8% forward and its stock price implies a modest discount to its underlying asset NAV. In contrast, recent private hotel transactions in Singapore are closing at cap rates of ~4.0–5.0%[4] (inverse of ~20× to 25× EBITDA multiples). This suggests private buyers are paying a premium relative to the cash yield available in the public markets. Part of this premium is for control and potential value creation – when you buy a hotel outright, you have the ability to reposition it, change management, etc., which a REIT investor lacks. Additionally, public markets may apply a conglomerate or liquidity discount to REITs.

‍

Bay Street’s framework explicitly considers an Illiquidity Premium (IP) – basically ensuring we account for the difference between private and public market pricing[52]. In Singapore’s case, the illiquidity premium is actually quite narrow. The market is so liquid and sought-after that private assets can trade at low yields not far off from bond-like returns. This means an investor should be cautious about overpaying: if you buy a hotel at a 4% cap and there are REIT units yielding 6%, you need a thesis for why your asset will outperform (either through growth or asset management) to justify that disparity. Otherwise, an LP might ask: why not just buy the REIT? At the same time, those REIT yields reflect partly diversified portfolios (including overseas assets) and sometimes higher leverage. A direct hotel acquisition in Singapore, unencumbered and in a prime location, might rightly demand a lower yield.

‍

Public comp overlay as a timing tool: Right now, public market sentiment for hospitality has been improving but is not euphoric – many REITs are trading at prices that suggest some skepticism about further upside (perhaps due to recession fears or rate concerns). If one expects a strong continued recovery, private acquisitions could “get ahead” of the public re-rating. In other words, entering privately at today’s prices might allow you to exit via a future REIT or portfolio sale at a tighter cap rate if the public market catches up. Historically, there have been periods where private market values exceed public (like now), and eventually either private values correct or public values rise. We aren’t seeing distress or price softening in private deals yet – in fact, Singapore’s average price per key hit record highs in 2024 (luxury segment averaging over US$1.22M per key)[53]. That implies sellers are confident in fundamentals.

‍

From a Bay Street quant perspective, this dynamic affects the Adjusted Hospitality Alpha – if you pay too high a price (low cap rate), your raw IRR might barely match the hospitality index, yielding a near-zero or negative AHA. To maintain a positive AHA in Singapore, one might target deals where you can still buy at a slight value – perhaps off-market deals, or assets with some operational issues to fix (hence priced a bit wider). Also, as interest rates decline, borrowing costs will drop and could improve the leveraged yield, helping AHA. The Bay Adjusted Sharpe will also reflect if an investor is essentially taking equity-like risk for bond-like returns – which would be a warning sign if BAS drops too low. Fortunately, Singapore’s low volatility props up the Sharpe, but we must remain vigilant not to erode the numerator (return) too much via overpricing.

‍

In summary, benchmark private opportunities against public metrics: if an acquisition’s yield is materially lower than what one could get through listed hospitality securities (adjusted for leverage and asset mix), ask whether the risk-adjusted incremental return (AHA) is truly worth it. In our view, Singapore’s private market, while richly valued, can still provide solid risk-adjusted returns because the risk side is so favorable. The public comps indicate that the market isn’t irrational – both public and private investors agree on Singapore’s strength, though public markets are a bit more cautious. This slight divergence may actually be a timing opportunity: by buying privately now in a recovering market, one might realize gains as public market confidence returns (i.e. multiple expansion). Indeed, the hospitality sector’s global RevPAR is now above 2019 by ~12%[54] and investors may soon factor that into higher valuations. Thus, our advice is to use public comps as a guide to avoid overpaying, but not as a deterrent from investing altogether. The strategic combination of low BMRI (risk) and recovering RevPAR (return growth) in Singapore justifies paying a premium – up to a point. So far, that equation appears to hold, and we recommend proceeding with acquisitions that clear internal return hurdles (e.g. delivering a Bay Score in the 70s or above, which by definition means they’ve been adjusted against public-market equivalence).

‍

Outlook and Recommendation: Act Now vs. Wait?

‍

All the analyzed indicators – Bay Score metrics, macro context, market fundamentals, and valuation benchmarks – coalesce into a clear investment stance: lean in to Singapore’s hotel market now, rather than sitting on the sidelines. We assign a “Buy” signal for private acquisitions of Singapore hotels at this junction, with a focus on high-quality or value-add assets. Here’s a summary of why the timing is favorable:

‍

Risk-Adjusted Edge: Singapore offers an exceptional Bay Adjusted Sharpe profile, marrying moderate returns with low volatility. The Bay Score for Singapore deals is high (mid-70s or more[29]), reflecting that after all adjustments for liquidity and macro risk, you still get a very competitive return. Waiting for a higher raw yield in a riskier market would likely yield a lower Bay Score once risk is factored in. In other words, the opportunity cost of waiting (or of choosing another market) is significant in risk-adjusted terms. Every quarter that passes with cash sitting idle or deployed in a less efficient market is a quarter Singapore’s stabilized hotels are earning solid income.
Strong Fundamentals Today (and Ahead): The hospitality upcycle in Singapore is in full swing, but not yet overextended. 2024 saw record ADR and very high occupancy, yet there’s room for further growth as key source markets like China and Indonesia fully normalize[55]. The government continues to invest in tourism infrastructure (expanding attractions, building Terminal 5, etc.), which bodes well for sustained demand growth[49]. No major supply surge is on the horizon – even projects completing in 2025 (like Raffles Sentosa Resort) are niche and limited in number. Our analysis of RevPAR trend suggests a plateau at a high level, not an imminent decline[56]. Thus, buying now secures exposure to the tail-end of the recovery and the stable plateau to follow. If one waits a year or two hoping for a price drop, one might miss this window of robust cash flow (and there’s no guarantee prices will drop – they could as easily rise if interest rates fall or if more capital floods in).
Relative Value vs. Peers: Regionally, Singapore stands out as a safe haven with improving returns, whereas some other markets have more clouds on the horizon. For example, Hong Kong is still working through oversupply and a slower tourism rebound; Thailand has political uncertainties; China’s reopening has been uneven. Singapore’s clarity and stability shine in comparison. The BMRI differential we showed underscores that Singapore is a strategic allocation for anyone looking at Asia-Pacific hotels[3][26]. The timing to pivot into safety is often when global uncertainty is high – currently, there are global recession worries and geopolitics (war, etc.) making investors skittish. During such times, capital tends to gravitate to safe, high-quality assets. We expect increasing interest in Singapore hotels as other markets’ risks materialize, which could drive valuations even higher. By acting now, an investor can get in before a possible “flight-to-quality” premium escalates.
Improving Financial Conditions: A key timing element is the interest rate cycle. Singapore’s rates move with global trends. With inflation easing and potential monetary loosening ahead, the cost of debt for hotel deals is likely to decline into 2025–2026[48]. Cap rates in Singapore have been stable so far[57], but if borrowing costs drop, we could even see cap rate compression (higher values) as more buyers can afford current yield levels. Entering before this happens allows one to ride the cap rate compression to gains. Conversely, the risk of rates spiking further seems to be waning; the worst of the rate shock is past. Thus, the financing environment is set to get better, not worse, for buyers – a classic cue to start deploying capital.
Clear Investment Committee Metrics: If we frame it in Bay Street’s investment process terms: the deal pipeline for Singapore would likely pass initial NPV/IRR screens (since hotels are profitable again), then score strongly on AHA, BAS (given high sector-relative performance and low risk), easily pass the LSD/BMRI filters (as we detailed), and achieve a composite Bay Score that warrants approval[58]. There is alignment between quantitative signal and qualitative logic here. Our recommendation is thus backed by both the numbers and the narrative.

‍

Risks & Why Not “Hold/Wait”: Of course, no investment is without risks. We acknowledge that valuation risk is the main concern – buying at peak RevPAR and low cap rates means any hiccup (e.g. a global shock reducing travel, or a surge of new rooms unexpectedly coming on market) could pressure performance or values. If one believed that we are at an absolute peak of the cycle, a “wait” argument could be to hold off and see if prices soften. However, our analysis does not see 2024 as an unsustainable peak but rather a new baseline of high performance, supported by structural factors (limited land, strong regional hub status, etc.). Singapore’s hotel market has historically been less cyclical than many – for instance, during the 2010s it was more plateau-like with mild up-and-down around a high occupancy norm. Additionally, sitting on cash has an opportunity cost, and if inflation is still 2–3%, waiting erodes real returns.

‍

A “Hold” stance might be justified if, say, one already owns Singapore hotels (meaning the question becomes do we sell or hold?). In that case, we would actually say hold (don’t sell) – because the prospects remain good and redeploying capital elsewhere would likely downgrade risk-adjusted returns. But as an entry decision, we favor buy now. One can mitigate valuation risk by being selective: target deals where you have an angle to add value (thus creating your own margin of safety) or partner with experienced local operators to ensure efficient management. Also consider smaller assets or those slightly outside the absolute prime segments; the data shows luxury assets in Singapore are fetching astronomical prices per key[53], whereas upscale/select-service hotels (the 4-star segment) attracted the bulk of 2024 deal volume at more reasonable pricing (~S$600k/key on average)[59]. These might offer better yield and upside.

‍

In conclusion, the Bay Street Quantamental Framework strongly supports immediate investment in Singapore’s hotel sector. The high Bay Score, low BMRI, and strong fundamentals collectively outweigh concerns about rich pricing. Singapore provides a rare combination of growth and safety – attributes that are especially valuable in today’s environment. Therefore, our timing recommendation is to “Buy” – act now to secure positions in Singapore’s hotel market. Maintain discipline on deal selection and pricing, but do not delay entry in hopes of a better macro moment that may never materialize. Singapore is a long-term winner in Asian hospitality, and current conditions present a window to invest with confidence in its resilience and risk-adjusted returns. [3][8]

‍

[1] [2] [13] [16] [18] [27] [28] [42] [52] [58] 46. Bay Street Quantamental Investment Process.docx

file://file-FvSmR1mBJdShE9TLcN4feL

[3] [23] [24] [25] [26] [31] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [41] 18. Macro Risk Overlays in Hospitality Investing_ The Role of the Bay Macro Risk Index (BMRI).docx